Policy Group
3000 Students
Jerome Joint School District No. 261
STUDENTS 3545
Student Questioning and Arrests
Interviews by School Administrators (Student Victims/Witnesses)
When a violation of Board policy or school rule occurs, the school principal or designee may question a potential
student victim or students who may have relevant information without prior consent of the parent/guardian.
Another adult should be present during the questioning of students.
Interviews by School Administrators (Student Suspect)
In situations where a student is suspected of violating Board policy or school rule, the principal or designee may
interview or question the suspected student without the prior consent of the student’s parent/guardian. The
school official must first have reasonable grounds to suspect that the student committed such a violation. The
nature and extent of the questioning must be reasonably related to the objectives of the questioning. If the
student denies involvement or culpability in any of the suspected activities, the student will be afforded the
opportunity to present their side of the story, orally or in writing.
Interviews and Questioning by Law Enforcement Officials
All contact between the school and law enforcement on matters involving students shall be made through the
building or school resource officer (SRO).
If a law enforcement officer is present on school property solely to question a specific, identified student, the
school’s administrative personnel or school resource officer (SRO) shall bring the student to a designated location
for questioning. Law enforcement officers who are present for such an interview should not otherwise roam the
school’s facility in an effort to locate the student. They should remain in the administration office while school
personnel seek out the student. However, if there is a safety concern or other emergency situation involving a
student, the school and law enforcement official shall work together on the best way to contact that student.
Any questioning of a student by law enforcement should take place in a private room or area where confidentiality
can be maintained.
When reasonably possible, parents/guardians should be given the chance to be present for questioning. A public
school shall notify a student’s parent or legal guardian by phone call or text message if a minor student has been or
may be questioned by a school resource officer or other law enforcement official, unless the child is a victim or
suspected victim of physical child abuse, abandonment, and/or neglect.
The District recognizes that it is not always possible to notify a parent/guardian of a student prior to an interview
by law enforcement, whether by an SRO or otherwise. At minimum, when the District is aware that such
questioning has occurred, the building principal or designee shall notify the parent/guardian of such event by
phone call or text before the end of the day when the interview occurred.
The School Board prefers that any interview of a student or a detainment of a student occur outside of school
hours and outside the school setting, when possible. However, when such activities cannot occur outside of the
school setting, the principal or designee will notify a parent/guardian of an interview or detainment of a minor
student by law enforcement officials.
School personnel shall not require any student to subject themselves to any law enforcement interview. If a
parent/legal guardian directs that a student is not to be subject to a law enforcement interview, such direction will
be honored by the school and law enforcement will have to make other arrangements to conduct such
questioning. Such parental direction shall be required for each case in which a law enforcement officer asks to
question a student.
The building principal or their designee may request to be present at the interview, but should not take part in any
questioning. If present, the principal or designee should at all times remain a neutral observer.
When students are questioned by law enforcement officers, District personnel are not responsible for a police
officer’s compliance with the law. If a parent/guardian or student refuses to consent to police questioning, it is the
law enforcement officer’s responsibility to respond appropriately to such refusal.
Questioning by Law Enforcement Officials About School-Related Violations
When a suspected violation of criminal law has occurred on school grounds, at a school sponsored activity, or an
activity involving school operations, law enforcement officers may be notified by school officials to request a
criminal investigation. Law enforcement officers may also independently determine that an investigation requiring
student interviews is necessary.
School discipline investigations conducted by school administrators and criminal investigations conducted by law
enforcement officers – with the exception of SRO personnel – shall be conducted in a parallel manner rather than
as a joint investigation. Therefore, a school discipline investigation need not stop as soon as the school
administrator believes that a crime has been committed. The results of the parallel investigations may be shared
among school officials and the police.
Questioning by Law Enforcement Officers About Non-School-Related Violations
The District strives to maintain cooperative working relations between law enforcement, child protective
authorities, and school authorities. Law enforcement officers may wish to interview students regarding their
knowledge of suspected criminal activity and may wish to question students who are themselves suspected of
engaging in criminal activity. Except when law enforcement officers have a warrant or other court order, or when
emergency or other exigent circumstances exist, conducting such interviews during the student’s class time is
discouraged. Whenever possible, such questioning on matters not related to school should take place away from
school and outside of school hours. Whether an interview will be permitted at school during school hours shall be
at the discretion of the principal, except when a warrant or court order requires that it be conducted immediately.
The principal and principal’s designee have the right and the obligation to take reasonable steps to prevent
disruption of school operations and the educational process while at the same time cooperating with law
enforcement efforts. Accordingly, the principal or designee shall work together with law enforcement officers to
coordinate efforts and minimize or prevent such disruption in cases of student interviews. In the event of
disagreement, the principal or designee shall immediately contact the area administrator or District legal counsel
for assistance.
Before any student interview begins regarding suspected criminal activity, the principal or designee shall ascertain
that the law enforcement officer has proper identification evidencing affiliation with an identified law enforcement
agency. The Idaho Department of Health and Welfare or law enforcement may exclude school personnel from any
child abuse investigations and related interviews and may use a school building to conduct the interview.
Arrests by Law Enforcement Officers
A law enforcement officer may take a student into custody if the student has been placed under arrest, if the
officer declares the student to be in imminent danger, or if the student’s parent/guardian and the student consent
to such release. When practical, the officer must first notify the principal or designee so that the student may be
summoned to the principal’s office and taken into custody in a manner that is as inconspicuous as possible and
minimizes disruption of school operations and the educational process. When an emergency situation arises and
the student is taken into custody or arrested on school premises without prior notification to the principal or
designee, the law enforcement officer should notify school authorities of the situation as soon as possible.
When a student is removed from school by law enforcement officers for any reason, the building principal or
designee will make every reasonable effort to notify the student’s parent/guardian, including attempts to contact
them by phone call or text message. The school official will document such effort in writing. When law
enforcement officers make a formal arrest or the student is otherwise in law enforcement custody, any and all
responsibility for that student is transferred to law enforcement personnel. If a school official has reason to believe
a student is wrongly detained or arrested, they shall not interfere in any way but will contact the Superintendent
explaining their reason which will be documented by the Superintendent and reported to the parent/guardian.
School officials will notify the appropriate area administrator of the removal of any student from school by law
enforcement under any circumstance. District personnel are not, responsible for an officer’s legal compliance with
respect to said arrest.
Definitions
“Interview” "questioning" means asking a student about an incident.
“Reasonable Suspicion” means a common-sense belief based on the information at hand that criminal activity or a
violation of school rule/policy has happened or will happen.
Legal References
IC § 16-1605 Child Protective Act: Reporting of Abuse, Abandonment or Neglect
IC § 16-1606 Child Protective Act: Immunity
IC § 16-1607 Child Protective Act: Reporting in Bad Faith-Civil Damages
IC § 16-1631 Child Protective Act: Authorization for Department to Act
IC § 20-516 Juvenile Corrections Act — Apprehension and Release of Juveniles — Detention
IC § 6-904(1) Tort Claims Against Governmental Entities —Exceptions to Governmental Liability
Other References Description
Idaho Att'y Gen. Ann. Rpt. 93-2 (1993) (last accessed November 18, 2019)
Cross References
Code
4400 Relations with Law Enforcement and Child Protective Agencies
5260 Abused and Neglected Child Reporting
5260 Abused and Neglected Child Reporting
Policy History:
Adopted on: 02/27/2024
Revised on: